The seventh season of "Wonderful Flowers" has a new competition system called "Nonsense Refutation Contest", which is "Competitors Read Questions and Answers" + "One-Sentence Answers". The contestants answer the questions given on the big screen, but they can only use the most After a set of rebuttals, the audience will score one by one according to the splendidness of the contestants’ rebuttals, and the top ranked will be promoted.
This competition system can be said to have wiped out the debate advantages of the players. The core is to leave a good impression on the audience in a very short sentence. A sentence is very short, and it has to be "slammed". In fact, it is difficult to carry more in-depth content. In the situation at that time, it has to impress the audience immediately, which means that the audience uses System 1 more, which is direct, automatic, and emotional. chemical reaction.
Like a short video? (I wrote an country email list article about this before: Why is it that short videos cannot escape the true fragrance law of [single-column immersion]? )
In the future, the largest platform for comprehensive publicity and distribution of film and television may not be Weibo, but Douyin, and now the largest platform for publicity and distribution of music is Douyin. Weibo strongly promotes short videos and NetEase Cloud strongly promotes music videos. It looks like an offense, but it is actually a passive defense.
Offensive and defensive transitions can’t just look at who did what, Douyin didn’t attack much, it was the era that was attacking, and short videos swept the entire era.
【Information Cocoon Room】Does it have to be harmful? Sub-scenario:
Save time level: People are looking for knowledge and high-quality information, so they must be alert to the narrowness of the algorithm;
Kill time level: [Information Cocoon Room] is actually not that important, because we are just for entertainment, killing time, and relaxation, such as watching short videos and watching funny jokes.
What’s really scary is that you think that during the kill time, what you receive is the content of the save time. For example, the elderly/teenagers are misled by the wrong values of some short videos (I hope this aspect can arouse the attention, reflection and correction of the whole society. ).
The goal of a company's recruiting is to find suitable talents, but after joining the company, you often find that the company does not know what kind of talents it needs.
Problem-solving, result-oriented anyone will say, what exactly is the person who solves the problem? The first easy-to-understand and easy-to-implement classification standard I saw in the product field was Liu Fei's:
20 Product Considerations
Figure: Judgment criteria for fresh product positions
Contrast this form, ask targeted and focused questions, and give corresponding scores during the interview process, which is much better than scoring based on impressions afterwards (trust me, after interviewing so many people, your memory is not so good) .
Many companies do not have such forms. In the final analysis, they have not figured out what kind of person they need. As long as you think clearly and swipe the standard, it is not difficult to convert it into an operable, implementable and standardizable solution.
One of the necessities of the existence of knowledge and entertainment such as Qihua said and obtained is: save time is an anti-human and mentally expensive thing, so it is easy to get tired, but these studious/anxious people do not want to kill time for other time, Knowledge entertainment is one of the buffer zones.
Reader: Why not update it every day?
Me: Because I can't do it...
For the same creator, the quality of the content and the time are often linked, and only slow work can produ