In the past three or four years, public opinion has begun to discuss the phenomenon of re-examination. Biggest reason: Using the easiest and quickest way to estimate retake rates (that is, the percentage of non-graduate candidates for a given exam), the increase in retake rates and estimates are a bit staggering (for example, 1 in 7 people retakes). test , or one in five to retake the test ). Some people think that this is due to the poor design of the admission system and the different interests of the repeaters ; some people think that most of the repeaters are actually "pursuing a dream school" ; some people think that young students understand the importance of future employment, or seriously clarify their personal aspirations, in order to focus on the future.
It's not a bad thing to take the test to adjust the trajectory of your life . Are retakes a concern? Is the actual retake rate really that high? The motivation to photo retouching retake the exam is that you can't find a suitable department, or can't get an ideal school? ... Maybe, we can't (without compiling expensive research and research funds) immediately conduct motivation surveys for repeaters, but if we use big data administrative data to examine "Which fresh candidates are more likely to become repeaters?", Maybe a quick complete image.
In recent years, the social sciences have become more and more popular to use the value-added application analysis of big data administrative data (administrative data) to explore social changes or evaluate the effectiveness of policies (in recent years, the school affairs research conducted by various universities is an application model). Public sector government governance is also paying more and more attention to the so-called "digital governance" and "evidence-based decision-